If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. safe distance from cell tower is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. safe distance to live from cell phone tower could result in many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther the tower is.
While this sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.